Skip to main content
DanManREAL/ AI_LAB
Updated Oct 24, 2026Request a test

My personal tier listSaved

AI Coding Agents Tier List

  • 12 personally ranked
  • 0 not ranked yet
  • 8 with receipts on file

Dossier

My tier: S1 receipt on file

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic · Claude Code

Runs at max effort in my Claude Code sessions.

Dan's review

Claude Opus 5.5 is extremely advanced, above all other models currently in many areas. The all-rounder MVP.

My view from daily use.
How to read my rankings and evidence

I rank these agents from daily use on my projects. The reports show specific costs, failures and results. My rankings are personal judgments; a controlled comparison needs the same task and conditions for every agent.

Method for controlled comparisons

  1. Every agent in a round gets the same real task, the same repository state and the same time box.
  2. Every run is recorded: logs, cost, time, failures, and whether the result passed review.
  3. Each controlled round ends with a verdict per agent, supported by published evidence. These results are separate from my personal placements.
  4. Vendor benchmark tables, pricing pages and agents' self-reports are context, not my measured results.
  5. Major releases are reasons to revisit a comparison. A new model release does not by itself establish a new result.

Publication history

  • Dan’s saved personal placements are shown separately from controlled comparisons, with his reviews and available reports.
  • The comparison method and evidence roster were published; no controlled head-to-head standings were established.

Independent testing. Sponsorships are always disclosed, and verdicts are never for sale.

Full testing method
Argue a placement on Discord